Clichés and stereotypes exist for a reason, but more often
than not there is an exception to the rule. “No publicity is bad publicity,” is
an over-used and well-known expression that people like to say when something
negative happens. This is such a popular phrase because even if the publicity
is negative, the person or issue is still being talked about and will be at the
forefront of people’s minds. Additionally, in the eyes of publicists, the only
thing that is “worse” than being talked about negatively, is to not be talked
about at all.
However this is not always true. Take Ray Rice as a prime
example: In February of 2014, a shocking video was released of Rice assaulting
his fiancé, and by September he was suspended indefinitely from the NFL. In a
situation like this, no amount of publicity is good. In fact, the loss of his
career can be attributed to the negative publicity, as no criminal charges were
made until the story was brought to the press and the NFL was forced to act.
Incidentally, Rice has been reinstated by the NFL after an appeal and he is
currently a free agent, not signed by any team. It is likely that he will never
be signed to any team due to all of the negative publicity that surrounds him.
No franchise would care to have that type of scandal and negative association
attached to their team.
For the most part, this expression is accurate, but there
will always be situations where there is no damage control that can be done
after a wave of negative publicity. This is why PR professionals are so
important and why there is a focus on issue and crisis management. Any large
company facing a scandal of any size should seek council for issues or crises,
whether externally from a PR firm, or an internal crisis management sector.
Large corporations will almost always bounce back from a crisis, but it is how
they handle it that will offer them longevity and consumer retention. Small
companies, however will require a much more careful PR plan in order to ensure
they come out on top of a crisis. The rap sheet of firms that have suffered
from major publicity scandals is never ending, but eventually the chatter
ceases and firms can get back to business as usual.
For any size company, a proactive perspective is always
better than a reactive one. It is in a company’s best interest to be prepared
for the worst, and monitor their actions to avoid scandals. Minimizing risk
before a scandal occurs will result in an easier resolution should one occur.
Comments
Post a Comment